lochness
Member
My Boyfriend is Amazing ^-^ <3!
Has been fed 25 cookies
Posts: 88
|
Post by lochness on Feb 22, 2014 20:50:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Roxabox on Feb 23, 2014 12:27:28 GMT -5
I'm not against it nor for it really. It's certainly not harmful to the baby at all to use the cord blood because they extract the blood after the baby is born and the cord is cut. The issue I have with this is that the medical industry is shitting out Cord Banks left and right and marketing them to expecting mothers in attempts to scare them into storing their baby's cord blood which is not cheap ($4000 minimum and health insurance doesn't cover it). Sure it's good to have if your child does develop a disease of some sort which the odds aren't that high and then you need to understand that even if your child develops something terrible the cord blood very rarely will help because the cells most likely are carrying the exact disease your child developed. From what I've managed to gather from it is that it's just a scare tactic for the medical industry to make more money in an already $250 MILLION dollar a year business (surprise surprise). If I could throw away $4000+ dollars without batting an eye would I do it? Sure. But unless I win the mega millions it's not happening and I won't feel any less protected.
|
|